edu|Kate Singapore · PSLE school choices · Posting Group 3 & Full SBB
PSLE score 22 is the final total in MOE’s PG2-or-PG3 overlap band. The child is eligible to choose either Posting Group 2 or Posting Group 3 for ordinary Secondary 1 posting, but must select one group for all six school choices. PG3 normally begins with G3 subjects; PG2 normally begins with G2 and may allow higher-level subjects where the student’s individual results meet the conditions. A score of 23 is different: it is PG2 only.
For the 2025 PSLE cohort entering Secondary 1 in 2026, many non-affiliated PG3 programmes ended at score 22, including Admiralty, Northbrooks, Greenridge, Jurongville, Marsiling, Sembawang and Woodlands Secondary. Those schools are at the historical boundary for a score-22 child choosing PG3. PG2 has separate cut-offs—often 23 to 25—so parents should compare two distinct routes rather than copy school names from one combined table.
Immediate information for parents:
- Score 22 can enter PG2 or PG3; a single Posting Group applies to the whole S1 submission.
- Several schools had old non-affiliated PG3 cut-off 22. Equal to an old COP never guarantees entry.
- PG2 options use PG2 ranges. Check school and programme fit, plus possible G3 subject-level eligibility under Full SBB.
- Score 23 is PG2 only, so do not assume the same group-choice rule continues one point higher.
Source date: MOE policy checked on 4 November 2026. School COPs below are from the 2025 PSLE cohort, who entered Secondary 1 in 2026. The 2027 Secondary 1 cut-offs are not known in advance. This is an independent explanation, not an MOE school-posting offer. MOE’s Posting Groups table · MOE’s score-range rules.
1. Compare the 2025 school cut-offs
At score 22, the family may choose PG2 or PG3. The first table below is for a family considering PG3. A later table shows separate PG2 outcomes. Decide on one Posting Group for the whole S1 application, rather than treating two columns as interchangeable.
| Secondary school | Area to verify | 2025 PG3 COP | At score 22 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marsiling Secondary School | Woodlands | 22 | Matches historical numerical boundary; not guaranteed |
| Northbrooks Secondary School | Yishun | 22 | Matches historical numerical boundary; not guaranteed |
| Bendemeer Secondary School | Kallang | 22 | Matches historical numerical boundary; not guaranteed |
| Bukit Merah Secondary School | Bukit Merah | 22 | Matches historical numerical boundary; not guaranteed |
| Greenridge Secondary School | Bukit Panjang | 22 | Matches historical numerical boundary; not guaranteed |
| Jurongville Secondary School | Jurong East | 22 | Matches historical numerical boundary; not guaranteed |
| Meridian Secondary School | Pasir Ris | 22 | Matches historical numerical boundary; not guaranteed |
| Northland Secondary School | Yishun | 22 | Matches historical numerical boundary; not guaranteed |
| Westwood Secondary School | Jurong West | 22 | Matches historical numerical boundary; not guaranteed |
| Woodlands Secondary School | Woodlands | 22 | Matches historical numerical boundary; not guaranteed |
| Admiralty Secondary School | Woodlands | 22 | Matches historical numerical boundary; not guaranteed |
| Assumption English School | Bukit Panjang | 22 | Matches historical numerical boundary; not guaranteed |
| Canberra Secondary School | Sembawang | 22 | Matches historical numerical boundary; not guaranteed |
| Dunearn Secondary School | Bukit Batok | 22 | Matches historical numerical boundary; not guaranteed |
| East Spring Secondary School | Tampines | 22 | Matches historical numerical boundary; not guaranteed |
| Sembawang Secondary School | Sembawang | 22 | Matches historical numerical boundary; not guaranteed |
| Woodlands Ring Secondary School | Woodlands | 22 | Matches historical numerical boundary; not guaranteed |
| Boon Lay Secondary School | Jurong West | 22 | Matches historical numerical boundary; not guaranteed |
| Broadrick Secondary School | Geylang | 22 | Matches historical numerical boundary; not guaranteed |
| Queenstown Secondary School | Queenstown | 22 | Matches historical numerical boundary; not guaranteed |
| Regent Secondary School | Choa Chu Kang | 22 | Matches historical numerical boundary; not guaranteed |
| Whitley Secondary School | Bishan | 22 | Matches historical numerical boundary; not guaranteed |
| Yio Chu Kang Secondary School | Ang Mo Kio | 22 | Matches historical numerical boundary; not guaranteed |
A separate comparison if the family chooses PG2
The following is a different applicant category: non-affiliated PG2 in the 2025 cohort. The family should not compare the numbers against PG3 seats. If PG2 is selected, use PG2 ranges for all six school choices. Read the full PG2 Score 22 guide.
| Secondary school | Area to verify | 2025 PG2 COP | At score 22 in PG2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hougang Secondary School | Hougang | 24 | 2 points stronger numerically than previous COP |
| Yishun Secondary School | Yishun | 24 | 2 points stronger numerically than previous COP |
| Zhenghua Secondary School | Bukit Panjang | 24 | 2 points stronger numerically than previous COP |
| Chua Chu Kang Secondary School | Choa Chu Kang | 24 | 2 points stronger numerically than previous COP |
| Bukit View Secondary School | Bukit Batok | 24 | 2 points stronger numerically than previous COP |
| Serangoon Secondary School | Hougang | 25 | 3 points stronger numerically than previous COP |
| Yuhua Secondary School | Jurong West | 25 | 3 points stronger numerically than previous COP |
| Bedok Green Secondary School | Bedok | 25 | 3 points stronger numerically than previous COP |
| New Town Secondary School | Queenstown | 25 | 3 points stronger numerically than previous COP |
| Peicai Secondary School | Serangoon | 25 | 3 points stronger numerically than previous COP |
| Peirce Secondary School | Bishan | 25 | 3 points stronger numerically than previous COP |
| Crescent Girls’ School | Queenstown | 23 | 1 point stronger numerically than previous COP |
| Tanjong Katong Girls’ School | Marine Parade | 23 | 1 point stronger numerically than previous COP |
3. Why score 22 is an important last overlap point
MOE’s table has a deliberate structure: scores 4–20 enter PG3; scores 21–22 may choose PG2 or PG3; scores 23–24 enter PG2; score 25 may choose PG1 or PG2; and scores 26–30 normally enter PG1 subject to the stated English and Mathematics condition. That means 22 is not a default PG3 assignment or a fixed PG2 assignment: it carries a decision.
At score 22, the family should look at the student’s readiness and interests, not simply follow what friends or relatives label as ‘better’. A child who is comfortable with G3 demand may prefer PG3, while another who needs consolidation may benefit from PG2 and eligible higher-level subjects. This is not a score-based diagnosis; the appropriate choice requires more evidence about the child.
The final decision applies to the six-school list. A parent cannot submit school A under PG3, school B under PG2 and then return to PG3 for school C. Choose the group first, confirm the official portal reflects it, and then check all six candidates against the appropriate historical row.
Return to the school comparison
4. What the 2025 PG3 COP of 22 actually means
The 2025 record contains many PG3 programmes whose non-affiliated cut-off was 22. Examples include Admiralty, Assumption English, Northbrooks, Marsiling, Greenridge, Jurongville, Bendemeer, Meridian, Woodlands Ring, Westwood and Queenstown Secondary. A child scoring 22 who chooses PG3 matches those former numerical endpoints.
Equal does not mean secure. The completed cohort’s cut-off is the score of the last pupil posted through that particular group. In a later cohort, more children may rank the school highly, vacancies may change, and several pupils with the same score can compete for the final place. MOE notes that even in the completed exercise, some pupils at the COP may not have been posted because tie-breakers were needed.
A family should therefore investigate a selection of schools rather than assume that all COP-22 entries are interchangeable. Look at geography, curriculum, CCAs, support for new students and the child’s sense of belonging. The school with the most practical journey and best learning environment may be a stronger life choice than one that simply has the same number.
Return to the school comparison
5. Why PG2 score ranges can look much wider
A PG2 application competes for PG2 seats, whose previous cut-offs are separate from PG3 outcomes. Several highly regarded mainstream schools had PG2 cut-offs of 22 or 23 in the 2025 cohort; many others ended at 24 or 25. These facts do not imply that a school accepted PG3 pupils with those scores.
For example, Yusof Ishak Secondary’s 2025 PG3 COP was 15 while its PG2 COP was 22. At score 22, a PG2 applicant can compare the second number at that historical boundary; the PG3 route was numerically beyond the former result. A school such as Clementi Town had a PG3 COP 13 and PG2 COP 23, which would be a different PG2 comparison for the same total of 22.
The right approach is to build two provisional shortlists on separate sheets, one for PG3 and one for PG2, then choose the group that best suits the child. After choosing, discard the other sheet as an ordinary posting plan. The existing PG2 Score 22 guide is designed for that second shortlist.
Return to the school comparison
6. What if the 2025 range begins at 23 but ends at 25?
A historical PG2 range of 23–25 tells us that in the completed exercise, the first PG2 pupil posted there had total 23 and the last had 25. It does not establish a minimum entry score of 23. If the child with 22 is eligible to choose PG2, a numerically stronger score is not barred merely for being better than the first pupil in the previous list.
This is a common source of incorrect school-choice advice. Parents may see a SchoolFinder row and say ‘PG2 accepts only scores 23 to 25’, then mistakenly remove the school from a PG2 shortlist for score 22. The range describes an earlier posting outcome, not a rigid threshold at both ends.
Still verify that the school offers the desired Posting Group, that the pupil’s actual eligibility letter supports it, and that no other programme conditions apply. A historical numerical margin is useful but not proof of admission. Use the same school-fit criteria for every option, regardless of the previous first-admitted total.
Return to the school comparison
7. How two children with score 22 might make different group decisions
One pupil may have individual ALs of 5+5+6+6, a fairly balanced profile. Another might have 3+5+6+8, showing a much stronger result in one subject and a weaker result in another. Both total 22, but parents should ask about specific strengths and support needs rather than assuming the two pupils need identical school experiences.
A family could investigate PG3 if the child is ready for its normal G3 workload across subjects and wants that route. Another might choose PG2 with opportunities for a more demanding level in one or more subjects where eligibility is met. These are decision illustrations, not recommendations based solely on a score pattern.
Ask teachers for examples of the child’s independent reasoning, ability to recover from mistakes and pace when new concepts are introduced. Ask the secondary school about subject-level arrangements and progression. The selected group should give the pupil a workable start from which learning can continue; it should not be treated as a status label.
Return to the school comparison
8. Affiliation at 22: do not borrow someone else’s category
Some schools with low non-affiliated PG3 cut-offs had very different affiliated outcomes. St. Andrew’s Secondary School’s historical non-affiliated PG3 COP was 9 while its affiliated PG3 COP was 22; Holy Innocents’ High had non-affiliated 14 and affiliated 22. These are examples of why a parent cannot treat any displayed 22 as a general non-affiliated admission comparison.
Check whether the child has an officially recognised primary-school affiliation with that particular secondary school and satisfies the current conditions. The answer cannot be inferred from a similar name, membership of a community or a family connection. If there is no valid affiliation, use the non-affiliated cut-off to understand the previous result.
Likewise, do not confuse an affiliated PG3 row with a non-affiliated PG2 row. They are different axes of the admission process. A trustworthy shortlist writes the posting group and applicant category beside every result and links back to the current MOE SchoolFinder record.
Return to the school comparison
9. Preparing six choices at the edge of PG3 eligibility
At score 22, the family should decide between PG2 and PG3 before spending time placing schools into a final preference order. Discuss the relative academic pace, available subject-level options and child’s current learning habits. The child should feel able to describe why the selected route suits them, rather than repeating that one group sounds more prestigious.
Once a group is selected, compare at least six eligible schools with genuine interest. For a PG3 submission, schools with previous COP 22 are at the historical boundary; there is no automatic two-point safety margin above it because 22 was the largest published PG3 non-affiliated COP in the 2025 examples. This makes school fit and the reality of possible posting results especially important. Ask the child’s primary school for support using the current official choice materials.
For a PG2 submission, the historical COP range may offer more numerical room at some schools. But do not confuse that with guaranteed placement or equal curriculum. Check the school’s subjects, travel, support, and the official group-and-programme codes, then submit all six in actual preference order.
Return to the school comparison
10. How a 2025 school cut-off should—and should not—be used
MOE’s historical school range is a record of real pupils posted to a particular school in a completed Secondary 1 exercise. The first number is the strongest total admitted in that category; the last number is the cut-off point, the weakest total admitted through that category. The first number is not a minimum entry score. A pupil who scores better than the first student in last year’s row is not disqualified for being ‘too strong’.
The 2025 cohort’s score ranges shown here describe entry into Secondary 1 in 2026. They are the latest completed reference available for the planned 2027 S1 intake as of 4 November 2026. A 2027 cut-off has not been fixed before that exercise. The new cohort’s scores, demand for particular programmes and number of places all affect the final boundary. This means the right question is not ‘Can I guarantee a seat because the old COP matches my child?’ It is ‘How does this historical comparison help me create a sensible list?’
Within the same total and relevant applicant category, some pupils at a previous COP were not admitted because tie-breakers applied. Distinguish a PG3 cut-off from a PG2 cut-off even when both appear on the same SchoolFinder page. The year, group, whether the child is affiliated, and the exact school programme all belong beside the number. MOE explains how to read PSLE ranges and why admission is not guaranteed.
Return to the school comparison
11. The actual S1 posting process and the order of six school choices
Under the general S1 posting process, academic merit as measured by the PSLE score is the first criterion for vacancies in the eligible Posting Group. Where two pupils with the same score are competing for the last vacancies in the same school, the tie-breakers are applied in order: citizenship priority, with Singapore Citizens before Permanent Residents and then International Students; the order of school choices; and computerised balloting if an otherwise equal tie remains.
Consider two Singapore Citizen pupils who both score 22. They are eligible for the same group, and neither has a distinct priority. If one listed the school first and the other fourth, first choice can decide between them when a tie for the last seat occurs. But a pupil with score 21 is numerically stronger; choice order does not cancel academic merit. The proper lesson is to list eligible schools in genuine preference order while considering the risk of concentrating all choices at a historical boundary.
Using all six choices is important. MOE advises families to consider a range of previous cut-offs and include two or three suitable schools whose earlier COPs were less stringent than the child’s score. This is prudent planning, not a guarantee or an algorithm for certain placement. A school should still be somewhere the child could actually study happily. Confirm the current choices, closing date and school codes on MOE’s official S1 posting page and read the official posting and tie-breaker explanation.
Return to the school comparison
12. How the subject AL profile matters after posting
The total PSLE score compresses four subject results into a single number. A student can achieve 22 through more than one combination of Achievement Levels. The same sum may conceal a clear strength in language, uncertainty in Mathematics, or an uneven profile across subjects. Those differences do not create additional ordinary S1 posting points, but they can help parents and teachers plan the next few months.
Take a recent piece of schoolwork and find the first uncertain step. If the child misunderstood an English question, the issue may be vocabulary or inference; if they wrote an answer without evidence, it may be explanation and organisation. In Mathematics, ask whether they chose the wrong representation, lost a prerequisite relationship, or made an arithmetic mistake after a correct method. In Science, separate observing, predicting and explaining.
The purpose is not to label the child by a national examination result. Choose one or two skills to practise, give short feedback, and check whether the understanding remains when the topic or question changes. Ask prospective schools how they support a student who is strong in one subject and needs help in another. The result helps select a Posting Group; actual learning samples and supportive conversations help the student thrive within the chosen school.
Return to the school comparison
13. The transition to Secondary 1: time, energy and help-seeking
A decision that appears sensible on an admissions chart may be difficult on a school day. Test the journey to the current campus during the time a pupil must arrive and after CCA dismissal. Include station waiting, bus transfers, walking, and travelling in the rain. Check for temporary school sites and campus-specific intake arrangements before assuming the address in an older article remains accurate.
Suppose a school adds 25 minutes each way compared with another option. That is 50 minutes each school day, or 250 minutes across five weekdays—over four hours. These figures are illustrative, not estimates for any of the schools in the table. The family may decide that a distinctive learning opportunity makes a longer commute worthwhile, but it should be a conscious trade-off.
Ask schools how new Secondary 1 students organise multiple homework deadlines, obtain clarification when confused, and find someone to speak to when problems accumulate. Students should participate in visits and shortlist decisions, not simply accept a ranking generated from the previous COPs. Education works over time; it is the daily environment, routines, people and feedback that turn a school placement into real learning.
Return to the school comparison
14. The 2027 SEC examination is not the new Secondary 1 student’s final exam
The Singapore-Cambridge Secondary Education Certificate (SEC) replaces the separate N(T), N(A) and O-Level national examinations starting with the graduating cohort that sits the new examination in 2027. It records subjects at G1, G2 or G3 levels, depending on the student’s actual subject choices and performance. The exam is not a new entrance test that every child must take upon joining S1 in 2027.
A child entering Secondary 1 in 2027 and following a typical four-year secondary programme would ordinarily reach Secondary 4 in 2030. Families should use current official information for the immediate posting decision and consult the eventual syllabus and post-secondary rules applicable to the student’s later examination year. MOE’s post-secondary admissions changes from 2028 are a separate timeline from the child’s first school day.
Posting Group, subject level and examination certificate should not be collapsed into one word. Posting Group is the initial placement category; G1, G2 and G3 describe subject demand; the SEC records national results. Under Full Subject-Based Banding, subject options and progression arrangements can respond to individual strengths. Read SEAB’s explanation of the SEC alongside MOE’s Posting Group table.
Return to the school comparison
15. Questions families ask about score 22
Is 22 eligible for Posting Group 3?
Yes. It is in the 21–22 overlap band, so the child can choose Posting Group 2 or 3.
Can we mix PG2 and PG3 schools in one six-choice submission?
No. The chosen Posting Group applies to all school choices in the ordinary S1 system.
Is a PG3 COP of 22 guaranteed for a child who scores 22?
No. The COP is a historical outcome and tie-breakers may still apply.
Can a score-22 student choose PG2 and still study some G3 subjects?
Possibly. Eligibility to offer certain more demanding subjects is based on the applicable subject results and school arrangements.
What changes if the score is 23?
Score 23 is PG2 only. Read the existing PG2 score-23 school-choice guide.
16. Official sources, evidence and continuing guides
First check MOE’s Posting Group eligibility table, the posting and tie-breaker process, how SchoolFinder score ranges should be interpreted, MOE SchoolFinder, the live S1 Posting page, and DSA-Sec requirements. For national examination progression, use SEAB’s SEC information.
School-range examples were cross-checked against the 2025 PSLE cohort non-IP cut-off point compilation and the 2026-intake school-range directory derived from MOE SchoolFinder. The original SchoolFinder record remains the official reference, and a historical COP never guarantees a future seat. Check the school and programme codes, affiliations and updated dates when the actual PSLE result is released.
Editorial scope: edu|Kate explains official school information in original plain language to help families. It does not rank teaching quality or guarantee school entry. For a pupil’s actual eligibility and posting, only the current MOE instructions and their official result should be used.