A learner’s work can become a powerful teaching example. Another student may see how a response was improved, how an error was corrected or how a difficult decision was handled. The educational value is real. So is the need to ask what information is being shared, whether the learner can be identified and how the provider handles consent and context.
Parents should distinguish between using an anonymous instructional example and circulating a child’s identifiable work, photograph or story more broadly than the lesson requires.
This independent guide concerns the use of student work as tuition examples. It does not describe Nan Hua Primary School or state current eduKate practices. The historical 2019 school-name URL is retained without implying school affiliation or present branch availability.
Ask what is being shared
A short anonymous excerpt used to explain a common issue is different from a full page showing a child’s name, school, mark or teacher comments.
The provider should be able to explain what information is necessary for the teaching purpose.
Teaching use and publicity use are different
Showing a de-identified example inside a lesson is not the same as placing a child’s work in an advertisement, social post or public testimonial.
Parents should ask which use is intended rather than assuming one permission covers every later context.
Preserve the learning context
A polished final version may have involved substantial tutor feedback. If the example is presented as evidence of independent performance, that context matters.
The instructional value is often stronger when the example shows the learning decision honestly rather than turning the page into a success claim.
Three example-use cases
In the first fictional case, the tutor removes identifying details and uses one short excerpt to discuss a common error with another class. The teaching purpose is clear and the learner is not exposed.
In the second, a marked page containing a child’s name and school is photographed for promotional use. The family asks the provider to separate teaching use from publicity and clarify the permission basis.
In the third, the learner volunteers a revised piece for peer discussion. The tutor still removes unrelated personal information and explains how much support was involved.
The work belongs in the lesson because of what it teaches
A student example should make the learning clearer, not make the child more public than necessary.
Revised on 7 September 2026 at the original 2019 URL. This is not a Nan Hua Primary School publication or endorsement. Use MOE SchoolFinder for official school information and verify current tuition information-handling and publicity practices directly with the provider.
