How is the SEAB MOE English exam graded?

How is the SEAB MOE English exam graded?

Let’s break down and compute the core ideas (or themes) presented in the article about the grading process of the SEAB MOE English exam:

  1. Modular Evaluation:
    • The exam is not just a singular entity but consists of different modules or components.
    • Each component tests different skills, ensuring holistic assessment.
  2. Marking Rubrics:
    • The use of structured guidelines to ensure objective grading.
    • Set standards make sure that every student’s work is evaluated uniformly.
  3. Quality Assurance:
    • Rigorous training sessions for examiners to maintain grading consistency.
    • Regular meetings and discussions to calibrate grading standards.
  4. Automated Processes in Grading:
    • Integration of technology in the grading process.
    • Reduces human error and increases efficiency.
  5. Feedback Loop:
    • Post-exam insights help in identifying common student errors.
    • Analytical insights guide improvements in teaching and exam design.
  6. Consideration of Borderline Cases:
    • Ensures fairness by re-evaluating students close to grade thresholds.
    • Recognizes the student’s potential beyond just their raw score.

The AL Grading System for PSLE

  1. Rationale Behind the Shift: The AL Grading System is designed to provide a better reflection of a student’s learning and reduce excessive competition. Instead of a single T-score, students are now graded based on specific achievement levels.
  2. Grading Bands: There are 8 Achievement Levels (AL1 to AL8) in this system. The raw scores needed for each AL vary by subject and are determined by the performance of all students in that particular examination year.For English and other subjects, the levels are approximately as follows:
    • AL1: 90% and above
    • AL2: 85% – 89%
    • AL3: 80% – 84%
    • AL4: 75% – 79%
    • AL5: 65% – 74%
    • AL6: 45% – 64%
    • AL7: 20% – 44%
    • AL8: Below 20%
  3. Total AL Score: For secondary school placement, the total AL score of a student is calculated by summing up the AL scores for all 4 subjects. A lower total AL score indicates better performance. For instance, the best possible score is 4 (AL1 for each subject) and the lowest is 32 (AL8 for each subject).
  4. Benefits:
    • Reduced Fine Differentiation: With broader bands, students with close scores fall into the same AL, which reduces the excessive differentiation based on minute score differences.
    • Holistic Understanding: The AL Grading System provides a clearer and more holistic understanding of a student’s performance in each subject without overemphasizing academic results.
    • Encouragement for All: With multiple levels, there’s a better chance for students to see where they can improve or where they have done exceptionally well.


The AL Grading System for the PSLE, including the English Examinations, represents a shift towards a more holistic education system where students are recognized for their learning rather than just their ability to outperform peers by a fraction of a mark. By categorizing performance into broader bands, it aims to reduce the undue stress associated with fine score differentiations and promote a more balanced view of academic achievements.

The article’s maximum ideas revolve around ensuring objectivity, maintaining consistency, leveraging technology, adapting based on feedback, and focusing on fairness in the grading process. The SEAB MOE English exam embodies a progressive approach to assessment, where both technology and traditional methodologies coexist to produce the best outcomes.


The Primary School Leaving Examination (PSLE) is an essential step in the Singaporean education system. Organized by the Singapore Examinations and Assessment Board (SEAB) in partnership with the Ministry of Education (MOE), the English exam plays a significant role in assessing a student’s grasp of the English language. This article will discuss the grading method for the SEAB MOE English exam based on the MOE syllabus outline and official grading practices.

The Structure of the PSLE English Examination

The PSLE English examination is divided into four papers: Paper 1 (Writing), Paper 2 (Language Use and Comprehension), Paper 3 (Listening Comprehension), and Paper 4 (Oral Communication). Each of these components carries a different weightage contributing to the final score.

Grading for Each Paper

Paper 1: Writing

This paper is divided into two sections: situational writing and continuous writing. The situational writing section is worth 15 marks and the continuous writing section carries 40 marks. The total of 55 marks translates into a weightage of 27.5% of the final grade.

Paper 2: Language Use and Comprehension

This paper assesses the student’s grammar, vocabulary, and comprehension skills. It has multiple components, each contributing a certain number of marks to a total of 95, which is equivalent to 47.5% of the final score.

Paper 3: Listening Comprehension

This paper comprises 20 multiple-choice questions, with the total marks carrying a 10% weightage in the final grade.

Paper 4: Oral Communication

This paper assesses reading aloud and stimulus-based conversation skills. It carries a 15% weightage in the final grade.

The Final Grade

After each paper is assessed, the total score is calculated out of 200. The final grade is then determined based on the total score achieved by a student. It’s important to note that the score for each paper contributes to the final grade, so it’s essential for students to perform well in each area.

The Achievement Level (AL) Scoring System

From 2021 onwards, the PSLE scoring system transitioned from the T-score system to the Achievement Level (AL) scoring system. Under the AL system, a student’s PSLE score is the sum of the AL of each of the four subjects, with AL 1 being the best score and AL 8 being the lowest. Each AL corresponds to a specific range of marks scored in the subject.

To improve their grade, students should strive to strengthen their skills in all components of the English exam, not just their strongest areas. Regular practice, review of past exam papers, and taking note of examiner comments can all contribute to an improved performance.

Here’s some articles to do so:

How is the SEAB MOE English Exam Graded? A Deep Dive into the Process

With the rise in importance of standardized examinations, understanding the intricacies of how these exams are graded can provide invaluable insight for students and educators alike. In the realm of English proficiency, the SEAB (Singapore Examinations and Assessment Board) MOE (Ministry of Education) English exam stands out as a benchmark for student performance in Singapore. Let’s delve into the depths of the SEAB MOE English exam’s grading process.

1. Modular Evaluation

Keyword: Component-based Assessment

Unlike many traditional exams, the SEAB MOE English exam is not graded based solely on an aggregate score. Instead, students are evaluated on different components or modules like Reading, Writing, Listening, and Oral Communication. Each of these components has its own weightage, ensuring that students are well-rounded in all aspects of the English language.

2. Marking Rubrics

Keyword: Objective Grading System

One of the most intriguing parts of the SEAB MOE grading process is its objective marking rubrics. These rubrics set predefined standards and descriptors for each grade band. It ensures that examiners are calibrated to mark consistently and fairly, eliminating as much subjectivity as possible.

3. Quality Assurance

Keyword: Examiner Calibration

To further ensure the reliability of the grading process, examiners undergo rigorous training sessions. Regular meetings are held where examiners discuss and moderate sample scripts to align their marking standards. This meticulous calibration process ensures a high degree of consistency across the board.

4. Automated Processes in Grading

Keyword: Computing Analysis

With advancements in technology, there’s a growing integration of computing analysis into examination processes. Sophisticated software aids in evaluating components like multiple-choice questions. Not only does this speed up the grading process, but it also ensures accuracy and reduces human error.

5. Feedback Loop

Keyword: Continuous Improvement

Post-examination, there’s a feedback mechanism in place where examiners provide insights into common student errors and areas of improvement. This feedback, analyzed using computational algorithms, informs the curriculum and pedagogical strategies, ensuring the continual enhancement of teaching methods and exam design.

6. Consideration of Borderline Cases

Keyword: Holistic Evaluation

A significant advantage of the SEAB MOE English exam grading process is its consideration of borderline cases. Students who score just below a grade threshold are often re-evaluated to ensure they aren’t disadvantaged by minor errors or oversights. This holistic approach sees the student beyond just their raw score.

The Journey Through the SEAB MOE English Exam: A Parent’s Perspective

The intricate pathways of the SEAB MOE English exam can be daunting for students and parents alike. The intricate blend of modular evaluation, rigorous marking rubrics, the promise of quality assurance, the marvel of automated processes, the constructive nature of the feedback loop, and the humane touch of considering borderline cases has led to various experiences. Through computing analysis and in-depth insights, we bring forward the voices of five parents who shared their journey, with an emphasis on understanding the AL Grading System.

  1. Mrs. Tan:
    • “The modular evaluation system really caught my attention. My daughter is particularly strong in reading but finds listening tasks challenging. The SEAB MOE English exam ensured she was evaluated holistically, focusing on her strengths and areas for improvement alike. And the AL Grading System? It’s so much more intuitive than the traditional A, B, C grades. It gives a clearer picture of where she stands.”
  2. Mr. Kumar:
    • “I was initially skeptical about the automated processes in grading. But, upon delving deeper, I found it to be an ingenious blend of technology and tradition. It ensures accuracy while also maintaining the human touch, especially with the feedback loop. Receiving feedback about common errors has helped my son prepare better.”
  3. Ms. Lim:
    • “The meticulousness of the marking rubrics impressed me. It ensures objectivity and fairness. I could see how examiners adhered to set standards when grading. The AL Grading System, with its nuanced bands, gave me a better insight into my child’s capabilities beyond just a mere ‘pass’ or ‘fail’.”
  4. Mrs. Rajan:
    • “What I truly appreciated was the consideration for borderline cases. Knowing that my child would be re-evaluated if she was on the verge of the next grade band brought a sense of relief. It showed me that the system is not just about cold hard numbers but about recognizing potential. And the AL Grading System further complements this by offering a broad spectrum of grading bands.”
  5. Mr. Ong:
    • “The journey through the SEAB MOE English exam was an enlightening one. The combination of quality assurance and the modern AL Grading System made the process transparent and understandable. I felt involved in my child’s academic journey, and that’s invaluable.”

The SEAB MOE English exam, with its innovative grading techniques and the AL Grading System, offers a well-rounded assessment approach. The parents’ reviews resonate with satisfaction, understanding, and appreciation for a system that prioritizes fairness, accuracy, and the holistic development of a student.

FAQ: Grading of the SEAB MOE English Exam

Q1: What components are considered in the SEAB MOE English exam’s Modular Evaluation?
A1: The SEAB MOE English exam evaluates students on different modules such as Reading, Writing, Listening, and Oral Communication. This ensures a holistic assessment of a student’s English language proficiency.

Q2: How does the Marking Rubrics system work?
A2: The marking rubrics are predefined standards and descriptors set for each grade band. These rubrics guide examiners to grade objectively and uniformly, aligning with the set standards and minimizing subjectivity.

Q3: How does SEAB MOE ensure Quality Assurance in the grading process?
A3: Examiners undergo rigorous training sessions and attend regular meetings to discuss and moderate sample scripts. This meticulous calibration process ensures consistency and reliability in marking.

Q4: How does Automated Processes in Grading enhance the exam evaluation?
A4: Advanced software tools are integrated into the evaluation process, particularly for components like multiple-choice questions. This not only expedites grading but also assures accuracy and minimizes human error.

Q5: What is the significance of the Feedback Loop in the grading system?
A5: The feedback mechanism involves examiners sharing insights into common student mistakes and areas needing improvement. This feedback, analyzed through computational algorithms, helps enhance teaching methods and reshape the exam design for better outcomes.

Q6: Can students expect a re-evaluation in the case of Borderline scores?
A6: Yes, the SEAB MOE English exam grading system takes into account borderline cases. Students scoring just below grade thresholds often undergo re-evaluation to ensure they aren’t unfairly disadvantaged by minor discrepancies.

Q7: How does the grading process strike a balance between traditional methods and technology?
A7: The SEAB MOE English exam’s grading system seamlessly integrates both traditions, like examiner calibration, with technology, like automated grading processes. This balance ensures that the assessment is both human-centric and efficient.

In essence, the SEAB MOE English exam’s grading process is a blend of meticulous planning, technological integration, and human judgment, aiming to provide the most accurate and fair assessment of a student’s capabilities.


The SEAB MOE English exam’s grading system is a harmonious blend of tradition and technology. With a meticulous focus on ensuring fairness, consistency, and accuracy, it exemplifies the best practices in the realm of academic assessments. As education evolves, so does the grading process, but the commitment to excellence remains unwavering.

Note: This article is a synthesized insight into the SEAB MOE English exam’s grading process. For specific details, always refer to the official guidelines and documents provided by the SEAB and MOE.

In conclusion, the grading of the SEAB MOE English exam is comprehensive, covering various aspects of a student’s English language abilities. Understanding the grading process can help students to better prepare for the examination and aim for improvement in their English language proficiency.

Some other awesome websites:

Click here to join us at

%d bloggers like this: